A domestic observability stack handles sensitive data, so Guomi migration and classified-protection audits are unavoidable. This covers SM2/SM3/SM4 replacement, audit requirements, tamper-proof logging, and a go-live checklist.
At a certain point in any localization effort, the question shifts from "will it run" to "is it compliant once it runs." An observability platform handles sensitive data—logs, metrics, traces—and those often contain account numbers, card numbers, and transaction records. Guomi (domestic cryptographic) migration and classified-protection (Dengbao) audits are therefore unavoidable. This piece covers how JuJing OBSERVE handles cryptographic migration, Dengbao 2.0 requirements, and audit trails, plus the acceptance points to pass before go-live.
The core of Guomi migration is replacing international algorithms with domestic ones. Three typical scenarios:
Two pitfalls stand out. First, many third-party SDKs do not support Guomi by default, so you must swap in a cryptographic library that does. Second, the certificate chain must be complete and verifiable by clients. A clean approach is to terminate Guomi at the ingress gateway so business services stay unaware of the change. Keys must rotate on a schedule, and rotation must not break decryption of already-stored logs—design that into the migration plan up front. A phased rollout keeps the risk low: migrate the transport layer first, then storage, then integrity checks.
Take the gateway first: enabling GMTLS requires a Guomi certificate and the matching Guomi-patched OpenSSL, with the cipher suite specified in config. Clients either switch to a Guomi-capable browser (a domestic browser or a Guomi plugin) or adapt at the SDK layer in both directions. The second scenario is log-at-rest encryption: use SM4 for field-level encryption between the collector and the store, encrypting only sensitive fields (card numbers, phone numbers) rather than whole log lines. That way query performance and compliance are both satisfied.
In a Dengbao assessment, an observability platform usually serves as the "security management center" and "centralized monitoring" carrier. The key items include:
"Audit logs cannot be deleted" is the item most teams lose points on. The platform must store audit logs separately from business logs, with independent permissions. A Dengbao assessment runs through five stages—classification, filing, remediation, assessment, and supervision—and an observability platform is mainly involved in remediation and assessment. Bring the assessment body in at the design stage, confirm the items, and write the hard requirements such as "audit logs are non-deletable" and "two-factor login" into the requirements document, rather than reworking after the fact.
Operations on the platform itself also need an audit trail: who changed an alert rule, who exported logs, who removed a data source. An audit record should carry at minimum the operator, timestamp, target object, before/after values, and source IP. JuJing writes audit events to a separate append-only store, so ordinary accounts cannot even see a delete entry point. Append-only storage paired with SM3 timestamp signing means any tampering with an audit record can be detected, satisfying the integrity requirement.
Before launching in a domestic environment, walk through this list:
Guomi and Dengbao are not a last-minute scramble before launch—they run through platform selection and deployment from day one. Ask about these three things up front when choosing a vendor and you will save yourself a large amount of rework later.